South Pasadena, CA · Cultural Heritage

ADUs on Historic Properties

Code Citation
SPMC 2.65(d)(6) + SPMC 36.350.200(J)
In One Sentence
ADUs are categorically exempt from the Certificate of Appropriateness requirement under Article IVH but are reviewed under a separate zoning-code framework that applies the city’s objective design standards for ADUs on historic properties.

The Categorical Article IVH Exemption

Article IVH categorically exempts ADUs from the Certificate of Appropriateness requirement. SPMC 2.65(d)(6) reads: “all alterations affecting an existing or proposed accessory dwelling unit” are exempt. There is no qualifier and no carve-out within Article IVH itself.

SPMC 2.65(d) — Exemptions from Requirements for Certificate of Appropriateness
“The following items of construction, work, or labor on an improvement or natural feature are deemed not to be an alteration for the purposes of this article and shall not require a certificate of appropriateness: … (6) All alterations affecting an existing or proposed accessory dwelling unit.”

An owner adding an ADU on a property in the South Pasadena Inventory of Cultural Resources does not need a Certificate of Appropriateness from the Cultural Heritage Commission for the ADU itself.

The Zoning-Code Review Track That Applies Instead

The zoning code runs a parallel review framework. SPMC 36.350.200(J) — the historic-property provision within the ADU ordinance — establishes objective design standards that ADUs on Inventory properties must meet to qualify for ministerial (staff-level) approval under California’s by-right ADU framework.

The standards address visibility from the public right-of-way; location on the lot; size and height relative to the primary dwelling; setbacks; orientation; materials; roof types and pitches; wall cladding; doors; and windows. The City’s published ADU Design Guidelines for Historic Properties (Architectural Resources Group, November 2021) explains these standards across approximately 90 pages with diagrams and examples.

Two Outcomes

If the ADU project meets all the objective design standards, it proceeds through ministerial approval. There is no discretionary Cultural Heritage Commission hearing, and no Certificate of Appropriateness is required.

If the project does not meet one or more standards, it requires Cultural Heritage Commission review under the zoning code provision — not under the Article IVH Certificate framework. The Commission then reviews the project against the design guidelines and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards through the zoning-code track.

The Visibility Test

The standards consider an ADU “visible from the public right-of-way” if it is visible from the street immediately in front of and within 10 feet on either side of any street-adjacent property line. For corner properties, both adjacent streets are considered. Alleys do not count as public right-of-way for this purpose.

Vegetation, gates, fencing, and other landscaping are not factored into the visibility test — they cannot be relied on to bring an otherwise visible structure under the threshold. ADUs that are not visible by this test are exempt from the design standards entirely.

The Available ADU Paths on Historic Properties

The ADU paths most commonly available on South Pasadena historic properties are detached new construction, conversion of an existing accessory structure, addition to an existing accessory structure, and a Junior ADU within the existing primary dwelling. The City’s published ADU permit application reflects this set of options for historic-resource projects, and the ARG Design Guidelines develop the design-standards framework for them. The attached-ADU path on historic residences is materially constrained by the design standards at SPMC 36.350.200(J) and the City’s interpretation, consistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15331, that attaching an ADU to a historic dwelling carries review implications beyond what the State’s by-right framework readily accommodates. Before treating an attached ADU on a historic property as a workable path, an owner should confirm the current zoning-code text at SPMC 36.350.200(J) and the City’s most recent application materials with Community Development.

Practical Implication

An owner planning an ADU on a property in the Inventory should not assume the project goes through Cultural Heritage Commission review by default — most ADUs that meet the design standards are ministerial and approved at staff level. Visibility is the most common discretionary trigger. Siting the ADU toward the rear of the property and meeting the standards on roof, cladding, doors, and windows generally clears the threshold.

Source: South Pasadena Municipal Code Chapter 2, Article IVH (Cultural Heritage Ordinance, Ord. No. 2315 § 2, 2017), § 2.65(d)(6). SPMC Chapter 36, § 36.350.200(J) (ADU ordinance — historic property provisions). City of South Pasadena, Design Guidelines for ADU Development on Historic Properties, prepared by Architectural Resources Group, November 2, 2021. CEQA Guidelines § 15331. California Government Code § 65852.2.

Request a Review

Considering work on a South Pasadena historic property?

Design 1 Studio reviews the Cultural Heritage Commission process, the discretionary review thresholds, and the project-specific design requirements before submission. We work the framework, not against it.