City of Los Angeles

Contributing vs. Non-Contributing

Code Citation
Each district’s certified Historic Resources Survey · LAMC §12.20.3 · Division 13B.8 (Historic Preservation), Chapter 1A LAMC

Definition

Contributing and Non-Contributing are the classifications that the certified Historic Resources Survey assigns to every parcel in an HPOZ. The classification determines which review procedure applies to a given property. The Survey is incorporated by reference into the Preservation Plan; the classifications it makes are binding on the Department of City Planning, the HPOZ Board, and the property owner.

The Department of City Planning’s current public-facing language consolidates the classifications into Contributing (which includes Contributing-Altered) and Non-Contributing for project-review purposes.

A Contributing structure is one identified in the Survey as Contributing — generally because it was built within the district’s Period of Significance and retains elements that identify it as belonging to that period. In some cases, structures built outside the Period of Significance are designated Contributing because they are compatible with the district’s historic context or because they are historic in their own right.

A Contributing-Altered structure dates from the Period of Significance and retains historic character despite alterations or additions, where the alterations are deemed reversible. Some Preservation Plans treat Contributing-Altered as a separate classification; others fold it into Contributing.

A Non-Contributing structure is one identified as not retaining historic character — typically because of irreversible alterations, construction outside the Period of Significance, vacant-lot status, or unpermitted construction.

What Flags It

The classification controls everything downstream. Significant work on a Contributing element triggers a Certificate of Appropriateness. New construction on a vacant lot or replacement of a Non-Contributor triggers a Certificate of Compatibility. Many projects on Contributing properties below the COA threshold proceed as Conforming Work on a Contributing Structure (CWC). Many projects on Non-Contributing properties proceed as Conforming Work on a Non-Contributing Structure (CWNC). The visibility framework, the conforming thresholds, the design guidelines that apply — all of them branch off the Contributing or Non-Contributing determination.

Status is verified by checking the certified Historic Resources Survey for the district. Survey information is also accessible through the City’s Zoning Information and Map Access System (ZIMAS) at zimas.lacity.org, where the HPOZ designation and Contributing status appear with the parcel record. The Office of Historic Resources can confirm classification details that ZIMAS does not display.

A Non-Contributing designation does not exempt a property from review. It changes which review procedure applies. Owners who treat Non-Contributing status as a green light to skip the HPOZ system find out otherwise — through a plan check correction, an enforcement notice, or both.

Worked ExampleA 1948 Minimal Traditional house in Hancock Park (district Period of Significance: 1920 to 1956) shows up in ZIMAS as Contributing. A 1962 stucco apartment building on the next block shows up as Non-Contributing because it was built outside the Period of Significance.

An owner of the apartment building proposes a 30% rear addition. Because the structure is Non-Contributing, the addition may qualify as Conforming Work on a Non-Contributing Structure under the Hancock Park Plan’s delegated list — provided it does not affect the front facade or break the side and top planes. The Minimal Traditional next door, even with the same proposed addition footprint, is treated entirely differently because the structure is Contributing. The two projects go through completely different review procedures because of the Survey classification, not because of the building footprint.

Source: Each district’s certified Historic Resources Survey, incorporated by reference into the adopted Preservation Plan. Citywide framework established under LAMC §12.20.3 and the procedural framework codified at Division 13B.8 of Chapter 1A LAMC.

Request a Review

Considering a project inside an HPOZ?

Each district has its own preservation plan and its own answer to what is permitted. Design 1 Studio reviews the district-specific framework, character-defining features, and the Certificate of Appropriateness pathway before design begins.

About Design 1 Studio

Building design firm based in Pasadena, California. Over a decade serving Los Angeles County with residential and commercial design, including ADUs, hillside projects, multifamily, and historic-district work. Inspector-led methodology focused on producing drawings that anticipate plan check rather than react to it. Specialty work in HPOZ navigation across LA’s preservation districts. Contact through design1.studio.